Compare Neighborhoods for Heat Adaptation Planning
A municipality developing a heat adaptation plan may first need to understand how heat exposure and vulnerability differ among neighborhoods and important community locations. By comparing downtown, a hospital, an airport, a park, and suburbs with different tree-cover levels, this example shows where heat concerns overlap with population vulnerability, limited tree cover, or other local conditions.
Municipal staff can use the results to compare neighborhoods, identify where different heat strategies may be needed, and document priority areas in an adaptation or comprehensive plan. Reviewing hourly and 10-year heat metrics together also helps distinguish where green infrastructure may be feasible from places where other heat-reduction or preparedness measures may be needed.
Select the map bounds
In the Location tab, select the county containing the city of interest.
In the Timeframe tab, “Hottest hour” is selected by default. After areas are selected, the hour can be adjusted.
Set up the map view
After the map loads, open the Layers tab in the upper-right map pane. In the Boundaries sub-tab, select Census Block Groups or Census Tracts to show smaller boundaries.
Use
Select
at the top of the map to add areas by clicking them.
Increase the temperature-map transparency to see the basemap and more easily select areas near hospitals, parks, or other landmarks.
Select areas across a city
The selected areas include an airport, downtown, a hospital, a park, a high-tree-cover suburb, and a low-tree-cover suburb. Other useful comparison areas may include commercial zones, construction areas with outdoor workers, or agricultural land.
After selecting the areas, assign each area a color and alias so the table and map are easier to read. Save the changes, then export the selections as a .uhim file so the same areas and custom appearances can be imported later. Turn on tinted table rows to distinguish area types more easily.
Compare Area Characteristics
The Land, Census, and Heat Vulnerability Index (HVI) tabs summarize each area’s population, land cover, and heat vulnerability.
Land Cover
The Land tab summarizes land-cover data for each selected area. Key patterns include:
- Tree cover is highest in the high-tree-cover suburb, followed by the park.
- Impervious cover is the highest downtown, followed by the hospital and the low-tree-cover suburb.
- Plantable space is estimated by subtracting tree cover and impervious cover from the total land area. It is highest in the park, airport, and high-tree-cover suburb, where grass and other open land are more common.
Areas with low tree cover and high plantable space may be good candidates for green infrastructure or other heat interventions, depending on their heat exposure and population characteristics. These differences can help a municipality screen where tree planting or green infrastructure may be feasible and where limited available space may require other heat-reduction strategies.
Census Data
The Census tab shows population characteristics for each selection and helps identify where people, especially vulnerable groups, are concentrated. This context helps target interventions to high-impact areas. In this example:
- Disadvantaged communities are concentrated downtown and near the hospital.
- The park and airport areas have lower incomes and higher percentages of people of color (POC), which may be associated with greater outdoor heat exposure. However, these areas have smaller older adult and disabled populations, two groups with higher susceptibility to heat stress.
- The largest population concentrations are downtown, in the low-tree-cover suburb, and in the airport block group.
These population and demographic indicators show who may be affected by an extreme heat event and how many people are exposed. Combined with the heat and land-cover results, they can help prioritize neighborhoods in an adaptation or comprehensive planning process.
Heat Vulnerability Index
The HVI tab combines statewide heat, population, and health-outcome indicators into a broader heat-risk profile. In this example:
The HVI ranks the suburbs highest for heat exposure, largely because of the increase in days above 85°F heat index from 2000 to 2021. Heat index combines air temperature and humidity to estimate how hot conditions feel to the human body.
Sociodemographic vulnerability is highest near the hospital and downtown, largely because of heat risk among the Black/African American population.
Health-outcome susceptibility is highest near the hospital, driven in part by the highest acute kidney failure emergency department visit rate in the statewide non-NYC dataset.
Together, these indicators give the hospital area the highest overall Heat Vulnerability Index ranking, followed by the downtown and suburban areas. For municipal planning, this ranking helps explain why a priority area may not be the hottest place: heat exposure and susceptibility are considered together.
Compare Heat
With the population and land-cover context in place, compare model-estimated urban heat patterns for an extreme heat event and examine how those patterns change in the 2050s replay. In the Extreme Heat Mapper, “historical” means a calibrated climate-model recreation of a past weather event, not direct observations. “Future” means that same recreated event is replayed under a hotter 2050s climate, with climate-forced changes in temperature, moisture, and related weather fields. It is not an independent climate projection that creates its own weather sequence. Simulations were conducted using i-Tree Cool Air for both the historical recreation and the 2050s replay. The model accounts for tree canopy, impervious surface, other land cover, elevation, anthropogenic heat, and related local factors; the resulting modeled outputs are the spatial temperature maps and tables shown in the tool. Modeled outputs can be explored as hourly values for a single event and as 10-year average summaries.
The Temperature tab reports statistics for the hour shown on the map: the maximum value within the selected area (the hottest pixel), the mean across all pixels in the area, and the minimum value.
Sorting by air temperature shows that the highest maximum values occur downtown, at the airport, and near the hospital. These same areas remain among the hottest in the 2050s replay. For this hour, however, the largest increases occur downtown for maximum and mean temperature and in the low-tree-cover suburb for minimum temperature.
Although maximum temperatures in the hottest areas are close to one another, about 0.5°F apart, mean temperature better summarizes conditions across each full area. Downtown’s mean temperature is more than 1°F higher than the suburban areas.
High minimum temperatures indicate areas with little green space and mostly residential or urban development. Because downtown includes a park, the highest minimum temperatures occur in the low-tree-cover suburb and near the hospital. Tonawanda, the low-tree-cover suburb, also has the largest increase in minimum temperature.
Repeat this process for the heat index and wet bulb globe temperature tables. WBGT combines air temperature, humidity, wind, and solar radiation to estimate heat stress. Sorting each statistic and decade helps compare extreme and average heat conditions during the event.
The Climate tab summarizes modeled outputs from the 300-meter, 10-year i-Tree Cool Air simulations for 2010–2019 and 2050–2059 using the thermodynamic global warming dataset. These 10-year summaries are separate from the 30-meter maps, which show modeled outputs for a single heat event.
The first table reports the average maximum heat metric from June through September over each 10-year period. It loads with Heat Index selected by default. The largest average heat-index increases occur in the suburbs, where lawns and limited shade can compound heat stress. However, these suburbs still have lower absolute heat-index values than the other compared areas.
The Heat Advisories & Warnings section summarizes modeled heat event days using the tool's NYS and National categories. NYS heat event days meet a heat index threshold above 95°F for at least two hours. The displayed historical averages are two NYS heat event days per year for downtown, the hospital, and the park, compared with one for the airport block group. These modeled outputs compare estimates for the selected locations; they are not airport weather-station observations or records of official National Weather Service advisories and warnings. For emergency and public-health planning, this comparison can help staff evaluate whether the modeled value for a single airport block group adequately represents potential heat exposure across nearby communities.
Export Map
The table review suggests three main findings:
- The hospital and downtown areas have the highest heat vulnerability and are also disadvantaged communities, making them high priorities for heat interventions. Lower plantable space, however, may limit some green-infrastructure options.
- The suburbs have lower overall heat vulnerability, but heat increases faster there in the 2050s replay. Their larger older adult and disabled populations may also increase heat risk.
- Some urban areas have more modeled NYS heat event days than the airport block group. The modeled output for one airport block group does not fully represent heat exposure across nearby urban areas.
The selected areas and tables can be exported together to share findings. Center the selected areas in the frame as much as possible and leave room in one corner for the legend before moving to the Export tab. In the Export tab, add a legend that includes the title, temperature scale, and selected areas in the bottom-left corner. Then export the map as a PNG file. The exported map can be included in planning documents or community meetings to communicate why neighborhoods were selected for further evaluation.
Conclusion
This example demonstrates that the hottest places are not always the same as the most vulnerable places. Downtown and hospital areas may have higher heat vulnerability and more disadvantaged communities, while suburban areas may show larger future increases in heat during the 2050s replay. Suburban populations may sometimes have higher rates of disabled or elderly individuals; living alone further increases risk. The example also shows that the airport block group's modeled NYS heat event frequency does not fully represent nearby urban conditions. A municipality could use this combined analysis to compare neighborhoods for an adaptation or comprehensive plan, flag potential gaps in emergency and public-health planning, and identify places that need more detailed local evaluation.